Compound V3
MITHRILLending / Borrowing · Multi-chain · $2.5B TVL · 15 contracts
Public risk assessment — scores are produced with the same methodology as monitored protocols
Security Profile
88
85
82
75
72
90
50
88
85
84
88
85
82
75
72
90
50
88
85
84
Audit History
Bug Bounty Program
Assessment
One of DeFi's most battle-tested lending protocols. V3 Comet architecture is simpler and safer than V2. Strong maturity (D6=90) and no exploits. Oracle single-source and governance centralization are the main drags.
Dimension Breakdown
How scores work →- Comet single-asset design drastically reduces admin surface vs V2
- Pause guardian for emergency response
- Configurator pattern separates config from execution
- No reentrancy exposure in core borrow/supply paths
- Conservative collateral factors, well-calibrated LTVs
- Absorb mechanism for bad debt socialization is explicit
- Single base asset per market simplifies liquidation math
- Flash loan borrowing not available in Comet architecture
- Chainlink primary oracle with staleness checks
- Custom price feeds per asset with governance control
- No TWAP dependency, direct Chainlink consumption
- Single oracle source per asset (no fallback chain)
- V3 live since Aug 2022 (~3.5 years), V2 since 2019 (org maturity 7+ years)
- Survived multiple market stress events (LUNA, FTX, SVB)
- Extensive audit history (OpenZeppelin, Trail of Bits, ChainSecurity)
- No exploits in V3 lifetime
- Z-factor: 0.847
- Governor Bravo with 2-day timelock
- COMP token governance, active voter participation
- Compound Labs retains outsized influence on proposals
- Configurator upgrades require governance vote
- Maximum resilience under independent adversarial testing
- Comprehensive security coverage across all attack surfaces
- Mature codebase with extensive battle testing
- No validated adversarial findings — score set to neutral baseline
- Mature monitoring and alerting infrastructure
- V2 oracle incident in 2022 handled with quick response
- Active bug bounty on Immunefi
- Transparent deployment and verification process
- Widely integrated across DeFi (Instadapp, DeFi Saver, etc.)
- Comet design limits cross-protocol re-entrancy surface
- External reward claiming adds minor attack surface
- Collateral asset risk delegated to governance
- Appears in 3 cross-protocol cascade chain(s)
- Member of 2 dependency cluster(s)
- Score: 84/100 (higher = more isolated from systemic risk)
- Source: cross_protocol_composition.json dependency analysis
- Standard OpenZeppelin base libraries
- Minimal proxy usage in V3 (non-upgradeable core)
- Well-audited Solidity compiler versions
- Clean dependency graph vs V2 complexity
Risk Drivers
Primary risk factors driving this score, ordered by severity.
Adversarial Risk Signals
Observable security posture indicators. These signals reflect publicly verifiable information and responsible disclosure outcomes. No specific vulnerability details are exposed.
Score History & Verification
Score provenance tracking begins with the next reassessment.
On-Chain Data
- Protocol Slug
- "compound-v3"
- Oracle
- BRORegistry (Base)
- Evidence
- IPFS (pinned)
- Staleness Threshold
- 24 hours
registry.getScore("compound-v3")Reduce exploitable risk
BlackHart Monitoring provides continuous adversarial analysis, vulnerability detection, remediation support, and verified reassessment when your risk posture improves.